Medical Malpractice News

Linder Votes To Protect Patients By Limiting Runaway Medical Malpractice Awards

“Across the country, patient care is being jeopardized by a medical liability system that rewards trial lawyers,” said Linder. “I have seen many friends leave the medical profession simply because they cannot afford to pay for their liability insurance, and it is the patients who suffer in the end. This bill should begin to address some of these imbalances,” Linder continued.

H.R. 5 is designed after a highly successful California law that has resulted in medical liability disputes being settled 26% faster, saving doctors and patients years in the courtroom, and saving California patients $6 billion annually on health care. The bill would institute a number of needed reforms, including a window of three years after suffering an injury during which an individual would be allowed to file a health care liability action and a cap on both non-economic and punitive damages. The bill would also direct that patients’ attorneys do not receive an unjust portion of a recovery, and ensure accountability by allocating damages in direct proportion to fault.

“The need for reform is clear. Malpractice insurance rates across the country have risen 505 percent since 1976, and the average jury award is now $3.5 million, up more than 70 percent since 1995,” said Linder. “The health care we receive in the United States is the best in the world because of the people who choose to enter the profession and the education they receive. It is a shame that we have allowed our runaway liability system to force many of these highly-trained professionals out of the medical field. We can - and must - do better,” Linder continued.

Less than 2 percent of malpractice claims result in trial victories for patients. Even in the case of a jury award, harmed patients receive less than 30 percent of what doctors pay for insurance. 

Please contact us if anyone you know has suffered from debilitating injuries due to medical malpractice in Minneapolis.

	Did You Know?
	Drug-switching practices happen and are very dangerous Another public-spirited drug giant, Merck, was forced to pay a settlement of $1.9 million to 17 states in 1995 for drug-switching practices involving its Medco subsidiary. Medco pharmacists, who had given excessively favorable treatment to Merck products, were thereafter required to reveal their Merck connection to their customers.